Welcome to the Linux Foundation Forum!

Lab 7.2 Ingress Controller - Service available via internal ip, not via ingress

Hi,

I'm running into an issue with Lab 7.2. I've managed to create the ClusterRole and ClusterRole binding as well as the traefik ingress controller. After doing this the ingress controller is up but on the external IP address I get a Connection Refused message from curl.

ip address for this vbox host:

2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:99:32:3f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.10.121/24 brd 10.10.10.255 scope global dynamic enp0s3
valid_lft 54906sec preferred_lft 54906sec
inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe99:323f/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

failing curl command:

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ curl -H "Host: www.example.com" http://10.10.10.121
curl: (7) Failed to connect to 10.10.10.121 port 80: Connection refused

Ingress exists, but it has no address. I suspect this might be the problem as the describe shows that the default-http-backend was not found (but I have no idea how to solve that...).

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ kubectl get ingress
NAME CLASS HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
ingress-test www.example.com 80 21h

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ kubectl describe ing ingress-test
Name: ingress-test
Namespace: default
Address:
Default backend: default-http-backend:80 ()
Rules:
Host Path Backends
---- ---- --------
www.example.com
/ secondapp:80 (192.168.148.24:80)
Annotations: kubernetes.io/ingress.class: traefik
Events:

I'm using VirtualBox so as mentioned in the labs, there maybe issues when using LoadBalancer instead of NodePort. The service is available on NodePort and running correctly:

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ kubectl get svc
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP 20d
nginx ClusterIP 10.105.71.234 443/TCP 19d
registry ClusterIP 10.105.67.82 5000/TCP 19d
secondapp LoadBalancer 10.110.213.97 80:32000/TCP 21h

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ kubectl describe svc secondapp
Name: secondapp
Namespace: default
Labels: run=my-nginx
Annotations:
Selector: example=second
Type: LoadBalancer
IP: 10.110.213.97
Port: 80/TCP
TargetPort: 80/TCP
NodePort: 32000/TCP
Endpoints: 192.168.148.24:80
Session Affinity: None
External Traffic Policy: Cluster
Events:

[email protected]:~/LFD259/labs/7/app2$ curl http://10.110.213.97
<!DOCTYPE html>


Welcome to nginx!

body { width: 35em; margin: 0 auto; font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; }


Welcome to nginx!

If you see this page, the nginx web server is successfully installed and working. Further configuration is required.

For online documentation and support please refer to nginx.org.
Commercial support is available at nginx.com.

Thank you for using nginx.


Any ideas what I'm missing here?

Comments

  • chrispokornichrispokorni Posts: 671

    Hi @tknoops,

    You mentioned this:

    I'm using VirtualBox so as mentioned in the labs, there maybe issues when using LoadBalancer instead of NodePort

    Yet your service is still a LoadBalancer type. Did you try changing it to a NodePort type instead?

    Regards,
    -Chris

  • tknoopstknoops Posts: 7

    HI @chrispokorni , completely forgot to mention that but yeah I did try that but to no effect. The labs don't say I have to change it back though as a NodePort will always be available even though there is no LoadBalancer available (like in non cloud setups like mine).

  • tknoopstknoops Posts: 7

    I removed everything, tried to switch to Traefik image 2.2.1 which got the traefik pods going into a error crash backoff loop. Switched back to image 1.17.3 (without removing anything but the serviceaccount/daemonset/service) and it worked. Not sure how as I've redeployed everything a few times already, but hope this helps someone in the future.

  • chrispokornichrispokorni Posts: 671

    The lab does not use traefik v2. If you read carefully step 4 of the ingress exercise, it states that v1.7.13 is used instead.

  • tknoopstknoops Posts: 7

    I'm aware of that but since 1.7.13 wasn't working either I was wondering if 2.2.1 did work. It didn't, but it did make me redeploy everything which somehow solved the issue :smile:

    For future references, address is still empty while I have both backend services available via the Traefik ingress service, so that wasn't part of the problem.

  • serewiczserewicz Posts: 778

    Hello,

    Perhaps if we troubleshoot from the pod out we can figure out where the issue may be.

    If you curl to the pod ip it works, 192.168.xx.yy? I think yes.
    If you curl to the endpoint of the service secondapp it works, 10.110.213.97? I think yes.

    So we know the web server is running and the service is working. On to if the Ingress controller is working. Do you see any messages for the Ingress controller pods or daemonset? If you run kubectl describe against each object are there any warnings or other messages that could help us to the next step?

    Your previous output indicates the Ingress pods are not getting IP addresses. As the IP is given via the API server that makes me wonder if there is an overall networking issue - not a Kubernetes issue.

    So, did you open up every port on every interface? VirtualBox locks down interfaces a bit and you may need to turn each one into promiscuous mode.

    From the host if you try to nc a VMs primary IP at port 80, does it connect to anything?

    Use tcpdump or wireshark to see where the traffic is going, both from the host as well as from the VM perspective?

    Troubleshooting network issues with VirtualBox can be tricky because there are several possible ways you set up the VB network. As well the host may have some firewall rules in place that are blocking the traffic. If nothing else works at least we can rule in or out that aspect with tcpdump information.

    Regards,

Sign In or Register to comment.