A PROPRIETARY SIDE TO LINUX BUILDS
EVERYONE,
I JUST CAME ACROSS THE RESURGENCE OF A COMPANY THAT I LOVE, AND I WANT TO SEE IT SUCCEED VERY BADLY, AND IT DAWNED ON ME THAT A WAY TO RETURN TO THE 80'S FEEL OF COMPUTING IS POSSIBLE.
THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SEE A RETURN OF THEIR FAVORITE COMPUTER COMPANIES, AND
IT MAY JUST BE POSSIBLE.
IF YOU TAKE AND BUILD IN KEYS TO A PARTICULAR BUILD, BUT IN A WAY WHERE ITS LIKE DUAL BOOTING WHERE ONE SIDE IS THE REG LINUX (VER) BUILD, AND THE OTHER OS, DUAL BOOT, FASHION IS THE LINUX (VENDOR NAME) (VER) BUILD. AND EACH COMPUTER COMPANY THAT SURFACES HAS ITS OWN UNIQUE KEY SET FOR ITS BUILD VERSION. I THINK WE COULD RE-INTRODUCE A PROPRIETARY SIDE FOR THESE COMPANIES TO GROW THEIR BUSINESS'S IN..
SO WHEN YOU BOOT UP YOU GET
BOOTSCREEN:
LINUX MANDRAKE VERSION N.NN
XYZ COMPUTER CORP LINUX MANDRAKE VERSION N.NN
AND WHEN YOU BOOT TO THE SECOND PROPIETARY BUILD YOU GET ALL THE PROPRIETARY PROGRAMS.
SO THAT PROGRAMMERS COULD FURTHER HELP SPUR DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS..
KEYSETS, AND ARE IN THE OS , AND ON THE INSTALL OF THE PROGRAMS, SO THAT YOU COULDN'T TAKE YOUR XYZ SOFTWARE AND INSTALL IT ON A MICROSOFT MACHINE, BECAUSE IT WILL NOT WORK, AND YOU COULDN'T
TAKE YOUR . XYZ COMPUTER CORP PROGRAM AND INSTALL IT ON YOUR XYY COMPUTER CORP MACHINE, BECAUSE IT WON'T INSTALL..
COPYRIGHT THE KEYSETS, THEY CAN STILL BE FREE TO THE COMPUTER MAKER, JUST A UNIQUE ID FOR THAT COMPUTER COMPANY.
THE COMPUTER COMPANIES LARGELY HAVE THEIR OWN LAWYERS TO MONITOR COPYRIGHT ISSUES..
IT WOULD ADD TO THE MARKET FOR PEOPLE LOOKING TO MAKE A COMPUTER SYSTEM GO, AND THE ONE I RAN ACROSS TODAY IS DEFINATELY A COMPANY CLOSE TO MY HEART.. I LOVE MY OLD MACHING AND I WANT TO SEE THE RESURGENCE OF THEIR COMPANY SUCEED.
IT DOESN'T ABANDON THE REGULAR USERS OR THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, WHICH COULD GO ON, BUT IT WOULD BLOW THE LARGELY GENERIC CLONE BUSINESS'S WIDE OPEN AND WOULD CREATE JOBS FOR TECHS AND PROGRAMMERS BOTH..
I KNOW ITS A TRIVIAL MATTER, UNTIL YOU START WANTING TO SEE YOUR FAVORITE COMPUTER COMPANY MAKE IT.
APPLES DOES IT, THEY ARE KEPT IN BUSINESS TOTALLY BY LAWYERS..
WHY NOT EVERYONE ELSE??\
ITS SEEMS LIKE A WASTE OF TIME BUT IT IS CLOSER TO GETTING THE MARKET TO SEGMENT AGAIN THEN JUST PURE OS ON A SYSTEM IS LIKELY TO..
YOU WANT THE MARKET TO SEGMENT THAT IS WHAT WAS DEVELOPED OUT OF THE MARKET GOING FORWARD FROM THE 1980'S..
I KNOW ITS STUPID, IT IS, BUT ITS NOT..
WELL THEY GOT THIS REALLY COOL GAME THAT IS ONLY ON XYZ MACHINES...
IT IS A CREATED 80'S ENVIRONMENT FOR THESE COMPUTER MAKERS WHERE EVERYTHING IS PROPRIETARY, THERE IS NO REAL NEED FOR IT, BUT IT GIVES THOSE LITTLE COMPUTER COMPANIES A LITTLE BIT OF LEVERAGE TO USE IN THEIR COMPUTER BUSINESS..
THEY ARE TRYING WITH THE OS BUILD ITSELF, OBUNTO, OS X, BUT THAT WORKS SLIGHTLY AGAINST THE COMPUTER MAKERS IN THAT, THEN THEY ARE RIDDING THEMSELVES OF A CORE GROUP OF USERS WHO ARE JUST PRACTICAL.. BUT DUAL BOOTING LINUX REG BUILD/PROPRIETARY BUILD DOESN'T.
AND YOU COULD STILL TRIPLE BOOT IF YOU WANTED 2,
WIN 7 / LINUX REG VER / LINUX PROPRIETARY BUILD.
ANYWAYS THANKS FOR YOUR TIME..
Comments
-
Please, write in lowecase.
PS: I didn't even bother to read the text0 -
That seems pretty questionable to me. I see you point about giving those companies a unique advantage over their competitors, but limiting the hardware that a software can run on will only limit their potential customer base. If as company makes hardware, but has built a particularly useful application it would be more beneficial to ship it in binary format with as a paid product to general consumers and include a free version for their direct customers as many have done before or to included a light-wight free opensource version with most of the features as a teaser to get people to purchase their software or hardware.
My point is that when a hardware company makes software it only limits their potential when the segregate their software from competitors hardware, if they develop software then they can sell software and extend their potential customer base rather than limiting it.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 167 LFX Mentorship
- 219 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 795 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 355 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 179 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 82 DevOps Engineer IT Professional Program
- 127 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 112 Express Training Courses
- 112 Express Courses - Discussion Forum
- 6.2K Training Courses
- 48 LFC110 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 17 LFC131 Class Forum
- 35 LFD102 Class Forum
- 227 LFD103 Class Forum
- 14 LFD110 Class Forum
- 39 LFD121 Class Forum
- 15 LFD133 Class Forum
- 7 LFD134 Class Forum
- 17 LFD137 Class Forum
- 63 LFD201 Class Forum
- 3 LFD210 Class Forum
- 5 LFD210-CN Class Forum
- 2 LFD213 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 128 LFD232 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 1 LFD233 Class Forum
- 2 LFD237 Class Forum
- 23 LFD254 Class Forum
- 697 LFD259 Class Forum
- 109 LFD272 Class Forum
- 3 LFD272-JP クラス フォーラム
- 10 LFD273 Class Forum
- 152 LFS101 Class Forum
- 1 LFS111 Class Forum
- 1 LFS112 Class Forum
- 1 LFS116 Class Forum
- 1 LFS118 Class Forum
- LFS120 Class Forum
- 7 LFS142 Class Forum
- 7 LFS144 Class Forum
- 3 LFS145 Class Forum
- 1 LFS146 Class Forum
- 3 LFS147 Class Forum
- 1 LFS148 Class Forum
- 15 LFS151 Class Forum
- 1 LFS157 Class Forum
- 33 LFS158 Class Forum
- 8 LFS162 Class Forum
- 1 LFS166 Class Forum
- 1 LFS167 Class Forum
- 3 LFS170 Class Forum
- 2 LFS171 Class Forum
- 1 LFS178 Class Forum
- 1 LFS180 Class Forum
- 1 LFS182 Class Forum
- 1 LFS183 Class Forum
- 29 LFS200 Class Forum
- 736 LFS201 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 2 LFS201-JP クラス フォーラム
- 14 LFS203 Class Forum
- 102 LFS207 Class Forum
- 1 LFS207-DE-Klassenforum
- 1 LFS207-JP クラス フォーラム
- 301 LFS211 Class Forum
- 55 LFS216 Class Forum
- 48 LFS241 Class Forum
- 42 LFS242 Class Forum
- 37 LFS243 Class Forum
- 15 LFS244 Class Forum
- LFS245 Class Forum
- LFS246 Class Forum
- 50 LFS250 Class Forum
- 1 LFS250-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS251 Class Forum
- 154 LFS253 Class Forum
- LFS254 Class Forum
- LFS255 Class Forum
- 5 LFS256 Class Forum
- 1 LFS257 Class Forum
- 1.3K LFS258 Class Forum
- 10 LFS258-JP クラス フォーラム
- 111 LFS260 Class Forum
- 159 LFS261 Class Forum
- 41 LFS262 Class Forum
- 82 LFS263 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 15 LFS264 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 11 LFS266 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 20 LFS267 Class Forum
- 24 LFS268 Class Forum
- 29 LFS269 Class Forum
- 1 LFS270 Class Forum
- 199 LFS272 Class Forum
- 1 LFS272-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS274 Class Forum
- 3 LFS281 Class Forum
- 9 LFW111 Class Forum
- 260 LFW211 Class Forum
- 182 LFW212 Class Forum
- 13 SKF100 Class Forum
- 1 SKF200 Class Forum
- 1 SKF201 Class Forum
- 782 Hardware
- 198 Drivers
- 68 I/O Devices
- 37 Monitors
- 96 Multimedia
- 174 Networking
- 91 Printers & Scanners
- 83 Storage
- 743 Linux Distributions
- 80 Debian
- 67 Fedora
- 15 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 23 openSUSE
- 143 Red Hat Enterprise
- 31 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 348 Ubuntu
- 461 Linux System Administration
- 39 Cloud Computing
- 70 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 90 Linux Security
- 77 Network Management
- 101 System Management
- 46 Web Management
- 64 Mobile Computing
- 17 Android
- 34 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1K Getting Started with Linux
- 371 Off Topic
- 114 Introductions
- 174 Small Talk
- 19 Study Material
- 507 Programming and Development
- 285 Kernel Development
- 204 Software Development
- 1.8K Software
- 211 Applications
- 180 Command Line
- 3 Compiling/Installing
- 405 Games
- 309 Installation
- 97 All In Program
- 97 All In Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)