Welcome to the Linux Foundation Forum!
Privacy concerns about how processes are displayed
Options
Apiman
Posts: 5
Any user can see all processes running on a Linux Computer and if he uses
ps -Af
even it's command line parameters are shown. Most times there is not much sensible information there, but there might be.
If we open a link from a mail someone has sent to us, it's link address might be visible to everyone in the system. Sometimes we might feel convenient to embed a password in the command line for some automatic process. You shouldn't do that!!, but many programs let you do so and some users might not be aware of it's risks.
I might be wrong, but I don't see a reason why this information should be exposed to all users in a system instead of making it available only for root and the owner of the process. :unsure:
0
Comments
-
You have brought up a valid concern that I have seen in other places, there are several cases where the output of PS can display too much information about specific user actions. Despite the concerns it has not yet been determined that it warrants modification of the application.
If your concern is great enough then it would be a good idea to visit the project development site at http://procps.sourceforge.net/ to recommend modifications to the code that would limit the output for non-admin users through various means.0 -
I guess it should be enough to make the kernel create /proc/<PIDS> with umask=007 for non root users, but I think it should be implemented within the kernel instead. As I'm not a kernel expert I might be wrong.0
-
My though was to simplify a modification to the application itself and have it check the user groups and if the user is not in the adm group only display pids with their own uid, if the user is in the adm group have it display information for all processes.0
-
I understand, but if /proc/<pid> rights are not changed, anyone can still access to all processes info, it will just hide the real issue.0
-
Apiman wrote:I understand, but if /proc/<pid> rights are not changed, anyone can still access to all processes info, it will just hide the real issue.
You have a good point, but I don't think the general users have enough knowledge to consider it a priority issue.
Have you attempting contacting the kernel mailing-list to recommend this change?0 -
Searching the kernel mailing-list I've found a patch that tackles this issue, but it seems that it has not be included in mainline:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg77864.html
I don't know if any distro implements some kind of patch like this but if someone can give me a clue would be great!
Edit: At least Openwall supports it (http://www.openwall.com/Owl/CHANGES-2.0.shtml)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 65 LFX Mentorship
- 118 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 618 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 322 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 141 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 56 DevOps Engineer IT Professional Program
- 67 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 6 Express Training Courses
- 6 Express Courses - Discussion Forum
- 2.4K Training Courses
- 19 LFC110 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 9 LFC131 Class Forum
- 31 LFD102 Class Forum
- 178 LFD103 Class Forum
- LFD110 Class Forum
- 24 LFD121 Class Forum
- LFD133 Class Forum
- 2 LFD137 Class Forum
- 62 LFD201 Class Forum
- 2 LFD210 Class Forum
- 1 LFD210-CN Class Forum
- 1 LFD213 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 128 LFD232 Class Forum - Discontinued
- LFD233 Class Forum
- LFD237 Class Forum
- 23 LFD254 Class Forum
- 660 LFD259 Class Forum
- 108 LFD272 Class Forum
- 1 LFD272-JP クラス フォーラム
- 4 LFD273 Class Forum
- 1 LFS101 Class Forum
- LFS116 Class Forum
- 2 LFS145 Class Forum
- LFS151 Class Forum
- LFS158 Class Forum
- LFS167 Class Forum
- 28 LFS200 Class Forum
- 740 LFS201 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 1 LFS201-JP クラス フォーラム
- 13 LFS203 Class Forum
- 98 LFS207 Class Forum
- 301 LFS211 Class Forum
- 54 LFS216 Class Forum
- 47 LFS241 Class Forum
- 41 LFS242 Class Forum
- 38 LFS243 Class Forum
- 12 LFS244 Class Forum
- LFS245 Class Forum
- 41 LFS250 Class Forum
- 1 LFS250-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS251 Class Forum
- 143 LFS253 Class Forum
- LFS254 Class Forum
- LFS255 Class Forum
- 2 LFS256 Class Forum
- LFS257 Class Forum
- 1.2K LFS258 Class Forum
- 10 LFS258-JP クラス フォーラム
- 109 LFS260 Class Forum
- 147 LFS261 Class Forum
- 39 LFS262 Class Forum
- 83 LFS263 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 15 LFS264 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 11 LFS266 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 21 LFS267 Class Forum
- 18 LFS268 Class Forum
- 26 LFS269 Class Forum
- 204 LFS272 Class Forum
- 1 LFS272-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS274 Class Forum
- 3 LFS281 Class Forum
- 258 LFW211 Class Forum
- 179 LFW212 Class Forum
- 9 SKF100 Class Forum
- SKF200 Class Forum
- 908 Hardware
- 221 Drivers
- 74 I/O Devices
- 44 Monitors
- 116 Multimedia
- 210 Networking
- 102 Printers & Scanners
- 86 Storage
- 765 Linux Distributions
- 88 Debian
- 66 Fedora
- 15 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 24 openSUSE
- 144 Red Hat Enterprise
- 33 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 357 Ubuntu
- 484 Linux System Administration
- 40 Cloud Computing
- 71 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 95 Linux Security
- 80 Network Management
- 108 System Management
- 52 Web Management
- 76 Mobile Computing
- 25 Android
- 36 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1.1K Getting Started with Linux
- 544 Off Topic
- 131 Introductions
- 223 Small Talk
- 22 Study Material
- 836 Programming and Development
- 285 Kernel Development
- 517 Software Development
- 975 Software
- 261 Applications
- 185 Command Line
- 3 Compiling/Installing
- 119 Games
- 318 Installation
- 65 All In Program
- 65 All In Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)