AppArmor and Capabilities
Hi,
In "Lab 33.2. Explore the AppArmor Security"
https://trainingportal.linuxfoundation.org/learn/course/linux-system-administration-essentials-lfs207/linux-security-modules/lab-exercises?page=2
...the capabilities commands getcap and setcap are used, whereas these commands are nowhere described before in this chapter 33.
In which way are they part of the AppArmor framework? I'm asking because if I read through the man pages of these commands, AppArmor is not referenced anywhere. So, are they independent commands or interconnected in some way with AppArmor? And why are they used at this point in the Lab (1. - 3.) before the AppArmor Profiles are set up (4. - ...)?
Thanks,
Urs
Answers
-
...As an addition to my question above, why do we need to set an AppArmor profile for the new
/bin/ping-xapplication? Even after a reboot, it already works as expected, after setting the capabilities withsudo setcap cap_net_raw+ep /bin/ping-xCould you please explain that too?
Thanks,
Urs0 -
Could anyone please answer this one too?
Thanks,
Urs0 -
Hi Urs,
In which way are they part of the AppArmor framework? I'm asking because if I read through the man >pages of these commands, AppArmor is not referenced anywhere. So, are they independent commands >or interconnected in some way with AppArmor?
AppArmor is related to 'getcap' and 'setcap' tools, and they can work together. But you also can work with 'getcap' and 'setcap' without AppArmor. I mean, they are independent tools, but as 'setcap' can modify the capabilities of files and what they can do, it's completely related to AppArmor.
I hope that helps!
Regards,
Luis.0 -
Hi Luis,
Thank your for your reply.
What I still do not understand is the workflow in Lab 33.2.. After setting the capabilities in Step 1-3, the new ping-x program works as expected, even after a reboot:
Step 2:
alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ ls -l /bin/ping -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 89768 Apr 8 2024 /bin/ping alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo cp /bin/ping /bin/ping-x alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ ls -l /bin/ping-x -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 89768 Nov 12 08:44 /bin/ping-x alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo getcap /bin/ping /bin/ping cap_net_raw=ep alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo getcap /bin/ping-x alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ ping-x -c3 -4 127.0.0.1 ping-x: socktype: SOCK_RAW ping-x: socket: Operation not permitted ping-x: => missing cap_net_raw+p capability or setuid? alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$
Step 3:
alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo setcap cap_net_raw+ep /bin/ping-x alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo getcap /bin/ping /bin/ping cap_net_raw=ep alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo getcap /bin/ping-x /bin/ping-x cap_net_raw=ep alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ ping-x -c3 -4 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.081 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2061ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.055/0.063/0.081/0.012 ms alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ sudo reboot # [... after reboot...] alu@ubuntu-dt-vm:~$ ping-x -c3 -4 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.070 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.066 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.051 ms --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2053ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.051/0.062/0.070/0.008 ms
Maybe I missed something, but this means that the following steps by generating the AppArmor profile with aa-genprof (Step 4+) become useless as it doesn't change anything in terms of the ping-x's behavior. The program ping-x works before and it also works after setting up the AppArmor profile.
Therefore, after restoring the latest VM snapshot, I tried it again without setting the capabilities, but this experiment failed. Only setting up an AppArmor profile without previously changing the capabilities seam not to work for some reason.
Hence, the only way I get the ping-x to work is setting the capabilities, with or without creating an AppArmor profile.
It would be great if you could further explain that behavior, so I can understand the relationship between setting the capabilities and AppArmor.
Thanks,
Urs0 -
Hi Urs,
It's seems to me it's working fine, as expected. What we do is the following:
1.- We try the ping tool, it works.
2.- We copy the ping tool to another file named ping-x.
3.- We try ping-x and this won't work. Why? Because it doesn't have the required capabilities. I tested this and it's working as expected:ubuntu@master:~$ sudo cp /bin/ping /bin/ping-x
ubuntu@master:~$ ping-x google.com
ping-x: socktype: SOCK_RAW
ping-x: socket: Operation not permitted
ping-x: => missing cap_net_raw+p capability or setuid?ubuntu@master:~$ getcap /bin/ping-x
ubuntu@master:~$
ubuntu@master:~$ getcap /bin/ping
/bin/ping cap_net_raw=ep4.- We add the cap_net_raw+ep capability to /bin/ping-x and it works.
That's it!
5.- About the profiles:
Maybe I missed something, but this means that the following steps by generating the AppArmor profile >with aa-genprof (Step 4+) become useless as it doesn't change anything in terms of the ping-x's >behavior. The program ping-x works before and it also works after setting up the AppArmor profile.
It's because the profile for ping-x was copied from ping. But if it was copied from a different type of tool -let's say from cupsd- it would have failed. So, the idea behind this is to give you an idea about profiles.
Regards,
Luis.0 -
Perfect, thank you very much.
Regards,
Urs1 -
Hi Urs, it's a pleasure

Luis.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 175 LFX Mentorship
- 175 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 745 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 372 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 168 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 73 DevOps IT Professional Program - Discontinued
- 3 DevOps & GitOps IT Professional Program
- 98 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 7.6K Training Courses & Learning Paths
- AI & ML Training
- Blockchain & Decentralized Identity Training
- Cloud & Containers Training
- Cybersecurity Training
- DevOps & Site-Reliability Training
- Linux Kernel Development Training
- Networking Training
- Open Source Best Practice Training
- System Administration Training
- System Engineering Training
- Web & Application Development Training
- 2 LFD103-JP クラス フォーラム
- 4 LFD210-CN Class Forum
- 764 LFD259 Class Forum
- 681 LFS101 Class Forum
- 2 LFS158-JP クラス フォーラム
- 162 LFS207 Class Forum
- 3 LFS207-DE-Klassenforum
- 4 LFS207-JP クラス フォーラム
- 61 LFS241 Class Forum
- 52 LFS242 Class Forum
- 42 LFS243 Class Forum
- 19 LFS244 Class Forum
- 4 LFS250-JP クラス フォーラム
- 166 LFS253 Class Forum
- 19 LFS256 Class Forum
- 1.4K LFS258 Class Forum
- 165 LFS261 Class Forum
- 26 LFS267 Class Forum
- 792 Hardware
- 202 Drivers
- 68 I/O Devices
- 37 Monitors
- 95 Multimedia
- 173 Networking
- 91 Printers & Scanners
- 87 Storage
- 768 Linux Distributions
- 81 Debian
- 67 Fedora
- 22 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 24 openSUSE
- 150 Red Hat Enterprise
- 31 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 356 Ubuntu
- 465 Linux System Administration
- 31 Cloud Computing
- 73 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 98 Linux Security
- 78 Network Management
- 101 System Management
- 46 Web Management
- 106 Mobile Computing
- 18 Android
- 73 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1K Getting Started with Linux
- 392 Off Topic
- 121 Introductions
- 181 Small Talk
- 29 Study Material
- 944 Programming and Development
- 310 Kernel Development
- 616 Software Development
- 977 Software
- 369 Applications
- 182 Command Line
- 5 Compiling/Installing
- 68 Games
- 317 Installation
- Archived
- 2 LFD140 Class Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)