LFS158: RBAC Authorization RoleBinding vs ClusterRoleBinding

LikaB

For RoleBinding, the example shared includes:

subjects:
- kind: User
  name: bob
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

For ClusterRoleBinding, the example shared includes:

subjects:
- apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: Group
  name: system:admins

Since the subject is an ordered list, order should matter? But the order is different for RoleBinding, and ClusterRoleBinding - I wonder if the ClusterRoleBinding example would work?
(https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/ shows it as having the same order as RoleBinding)
Something to try, I guess!

LikaB

Edited to better represent code

Flavia

Hi @LikaB

Please use the code block in the post ribbon. It will preserve the proper formatting and should not trigger any reviews.

Best,
Flavia

chrispokorni

Hi @LikaB,

Within the same indent block order does not matter. You can write the attribute pairs in alphabetical order, or order them based on personal preference.

Regards,
-Chris

LikaB

@Flavia Thx for the explanation... but that's what I used in the final edit? a code block. Must've done something wrong ...

@chrispokorni Thanks, that's true of YAML maps, sure, but the hyphen indicates an ordered list, does it not?