lab 11.2 ingress balancing and not routing based on host header
I've got an issue where after i've setup lab 11.2 ingress with two nginx pods and the corresponding ingress controllers and ingress rules etc. despite curling to load-balancer IP using the host header, they traffic is always balanced between the two, the host header seems to be ignored.
kubectl get pods NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-2jwkw 2/2 Running 281 (3d23h ago) 5d myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-bjbh9 2/2 Running 0 3d23h nfs-subdir-external-provisioner-6b958d8dd5-fqt4z 1/1 Running 16 (3d23h ago) 68d web-one-6bd47f96d7-5przs 1/1 Running 0 5d2h web-two-6bd47f96d7-4bchp 1/1 Running 1 (3d23h ago) 5d2h
kubectl get svc NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 <none> 443/TCP 84d myingress-ingress-nginx-controller LoadBalancer 10.100.109.123 <pending> 80:31751/TCP,443:31047/TCP 10d myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-admission ClusterIP 10.97.128.57 <none> 443/TCP 10d web-one ClusterIP 10.102.13.165 <none> 80/TCP 72m web-two ClusterIP 10.104.211.198 <none> 80/TCP 71
kubectl get ingress -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
items:
- apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/service-upstream: "true"
creationTimestamp: "2025-06-18T20:01:34Z"
generation: 2
name: ingress-test
namespace: default
resourceVersion: "5609621"
uid: d48f43a7-097b-41cb-ba4d-742f880649bc
spec:
ingressClassName: nginx
rules:- host: www.internal.com
http:
paths:- backend:
service:
name: web-two
port:
number: 80
path: /
pathType: ImplementationSpecific
- backend:
- host: www.external.com
http:
paths:- backend:
service:
name: web-one
port:
number: 80
path: /
pathType: ImplementationSpecific
status:
loadBalancer: {}
kind: List
metadata:
resourceVersion: ""
- backend:
- host: www.internal.com
Comments
-
Hi @dsfraser,
Are the two applications web-one and web-two distinct? Do they return different content when accessed individually, and you can tell for sure which application was accessed based on its returned response?
Regards,
-Chris0 -
Thanks for the reply chris, they are both nginx web servers and as per the instructions I have adjusted the index.html file to state either EXTERNAL or INTERNAL, but what happens is if I curl to external for example I get both INTERNAL And EXTERNAL output, it's like it's ignoring the host header and just balancing.
root@master1:~# curl -H "Host: www.external.com" http://10.100.109.123
<!DOCTYPE html>
Welcome to INTERNAL!root@master1:~# curl -H "Host: www.external.com" http://10.100.109.123
<!DOCTYPE html>
Welcome to EXTERNAL!-Sam Fraser
0 -
Hi @dsfraser,
Please provide the outputs for the following commands, using the
codeformatting for readability:kubectl get pod,svc,ep -o wide kubectl get ingress kubectl describe ingress ingress-test
Regards,
-Chris0 -
`root@master1:~# kubectl get pod,svc,ep -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
pod/books-54c8659c75-5fjzt 1/1 Running 0 26d 192.168.2.194 worker1
pod/books-54c8659c75-fn55h 1/1 Running 1 (3d10h ago) 26d 192.168.1.247 worker2
pod/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-dl5lj 1/1 Running 0 31m 192.168.2.39 worker1
pod/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-lnl2c 1/1 Running 0 31m 192.168.1.241 worker2
pod/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner-6b958d8dd5-fqt4z 1/1 Running 17 (3d10h ago) 96d 192.168.2.197 worker1
pod/web-one-6bd47f96d7-5przs 1/1 Running 1 (3d10h ago) 33d 192.168.1.160 worker2
pod/web-two-6bd47f96d7-4bchp 1/1 Running 1 (31d ago) 33d 192.168.2.251 worker1NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
service/books ClusterIP 10.103.181.252 80/TCP 26d app=books
service/kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 443/TCP 112d
service/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller LoadBalancer 10.110.174.163 80:32115/TCP,443:32500/TCP 31m app.kubernetes.io/component=controller,app.kubernetes.io/instance=myingress,app.kubernetes.io/name=ingress-nginx
service/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-admission ClusterIP 10.111.218.135 443/TCP 31m app.kubernetes.io/component=controller,app.kubernetes.io/instance=myingress,app.kubernetes.io/name=ingress-nginx
service/web-one ClusterIP 10.102.13.165 80/TCP 28d system=secondary
service/web-two ClusterIP 10.104.211.198 80/TCP 28d system=secondaryNAME ENDPOINTS AGE
endpoints/books 192.168.1.247:80,192.168.2.194:80 26d
endpoints/cluster.local-nfs-subdir-external-provisioner 104d
endpoints/kubernetes 172.28.98.3:6443 112d
endpoints/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller 192.168.1.241:443,192.168.2.39:443,192.168.1.241:80 + 1 more... 31m
endpoints/myingress-ingress-nginx-controller-admission 192.168.1.241:8443,192.168.2.39:8443 31m
endpoints/web-one 192.168.1.160:80,192.168.2.251:80 28d
endpoints/web-two 192.168.1.160:80,192.168.2.251:80 28d
root@master1:~# kubectl get ingress
NAME CLASS HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
ingress-test nginx www.internal.com,www.external.com 80 33d
root@master1:~# kubectl describe ingress ingress-test
Name: ingress-test
Labels:
Namespace: default
Address:
Ingress Class: nginx
Default backend:
Rules:
Host Path Backends
---- ---- --------
www.internal.com
/ web-two:80 (192.168.1.160:80,192.168.2.251:80)
www.external.com
/ web-one:80 (192.168.1.160:80,192.168.2.251:80)
Annotations: kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/service-upstream: true
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Sync 33m nginx-ingress-controller Scheduled for sync
Normal Sync 33m nginx-ingress-controller Scheduled for sync0 -
Hi @dsfraser,
For future reference, ensure the code block is closed also, to help format terminal content for readability.
From your output, several objects seems to be adequate:
- 1 pod replica for the web-one deployment, and 1 pod replica for the web-two deployment
- 1 service web-one (presumably) exposing the web-one deployment, and 1 service web-two (presumably) exposing the web-two deployment
However, what seems to be inadequate is the following:
- 2 endpoints behind the web-one service, and 2 endpoints behind the web-two service
A single pod replica for the web-one deployment should yield a single web-one endpoint behind the web-one service, and the same should be the case for the web-two pod - deployment - endpoint - service. It seems you misconfigured the two services and they cross manage the 2 deployments' replicas.
I recommend you either troubleshoot and fix the existing web-one and web-two deployments and services, or tear them down and redeploy them from scratch. It is essential that the web-one and web-two objects are managed by distinct labels and selectors.
Regards,
-Chris0 -
apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: annotations: deployment.kubernetes.io/revision: "1" creationTimestamp: "2025-06-18T19:38:03Z" generation: 2 name: web-two namespace: default resourceVersion: "4988942" uid: 00f56163-5d1e-46c3-ba83-929a622ac3ea spec: progressDeadlineSeconds: 600 replicas: 1 revisionHistoryLimit: 10 selector: matchLabels: system: secondary strategy: rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 25% maxUnavailable: 25% type: RollingUpdate template: metadata: creationTimestamp: null labels: system: secondary spec: containers: - image: nginx:1.20.1 imagePullPolicy: Always name: nginx ports: - containerPort: 80 protocol: TCP resources: {} terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log terminationMessagePolicy: File dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst restartPolicy: Always schedulerName: default-scheduler securityContext: {} terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 300 -
I'm sorry, inserting the terminal output in-between the `` is not working for me.
This above is the deployment I'm using for web-one and web-two, the only difference being the name. It's a deployment used in a previous lab and thought it would be ok as the labels were being used as a taint and now ineffective. Why is it creating two endpoints? The pod output shows only one node target...
0 -
Hi @dsfraser,
Aside from distinct names, deployments and their respective services must have distinct/unique labels and selectors. You may be re-using the
system: secondarylabel between the two deployments, and their respective services inheriting it as well. This label was never intended to replace the deployment's own label, it was supposed to be an additional label to help in the context of the earlier exercise.Regards,
-Chris0 -
Thanks very much @chrispokorni for your advice. I have got this working now.
The big surprise for me in all this is that a deployment can end up with another deployments pods and endpoints. I created two nginx deployments with 2 replicas each (one on each node) and then created the ingress to point a host header to each deployment. I manipulated each replicas index.html file to display text relevant to that deployments name e.g. "welcome to web-one/welcome to web-two" based on the header included in the curl. Works fine now, but good lessons learned! Thanks.0 -
Hi @dsfraser,
Kubernetes uses labels as a backbone to logically connect the types of objects that together implement an application's lifecycle operations (self-healing, scaling, updates), traffic management (load balancing, DNS) - in this case the
deployment, its underlyingreplicaset, thepodreplica(s), and theservice.
The objects launched to manage theweb-oneapplication should be logically connected by a unique label, such asapp=web-one, to separate them from the objects managingweb-two. A common label shared by many deployments causes scaling and update inconsistencies, while a common label shared by multiple services causes undesired traffic load balancing.Regards,
-Chris0
Categories
- All Categories
- 177 LFX Mentorship
- 177 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 750 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 373 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 169 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 74 DevOps IT Professional Program - Discontinued
- 4 DevOps & GitOps IT Professional Program
- 99 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 7.6K Training Courses & Learning Paths
- 1 AI & ML Training
- 1 Blockchain & Decentralized Identity Training
- 3 Cloud & Containers Training
- 1 Cybersecurity Training
- 2 DevOps & Site-Reliability Training
- 1 Linux Kernel Development Training
- 1 Networking Training
- 1 Open Source Best Practice Training
- 1 System Administration Training
- 1 System Engineering Training
- 1 Web & Application Development Training
- 792 Hardware
- 202 Drivers
- 68 I/O Devices
- 37 Monitors
- 95 Multimedia
- 173 Networking
- 91 Printers & Scanners
- 87 Storage
- 769 Linux Distributions
- 81 Debian
- 68 Fedora
- 22 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 24 openSUSE
- 150 Red Hat Enterprise
- 31 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 356 Ubuntu
- 465 Linux System Administration
- 31 Cloud Computing
- 73 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 98 Linux Security
- 78 Network Management
- 101 System Management
- 46 Web Management
- 106 Mobile Computing
- 18 Android
- 73 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1K Getting Started with Linux
- 392 Off Topic
- 121 Introductions
- 181 Small Talk
- 29 Study Material
- 955 Programming and Development
- 310 Kernel Development
- 627 Software Development
- 983 Software
- 375 Applications
- 182 Command Line
- 5 Compiling/Installing
- 68 Games
- 317 Installation
- Archived
- 2 LFD140 Class Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)