Lab 8.3: NFS volume fails to mount
Hello,
I was going to ask for some guidance, but just figured out the solution. I'll post it here in-case anyone encounters the same problem.
I was stuck between step 7 & 8 of lab 8.3.
PV and PVC were created OK, but the pod created in step 6 seems to fail to mount the NFS volume and I was uncertain whether I made a mistake or if there's was another problem.
kubectl get pods
:
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE nginx-nfs-5f58fd64fd-qsqs8 0/1 ContainerCreating 0 16m
kubectl describe pod nginx-nfs-5f58fd64fd-qsqs8
:
Name: nginx-nfs-5f58fd64fd-qsqs8 Namespace: default Priority: 0 Node: k8s-worker/172.31.46.65 Start Time: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:14:36 +0000 Labels: pod-template-hash=5f58fd64fd run=nginx Annotations: <none> Status: Pending IP: IPs: <none> Controlled By: ReplicaSet/nginx-nfs-5f58fd64fd Containers: nginx: Container ID: Image: nginx Image ID: Port: 80/TCP Host Port: 0/TCP State: Waiting Reason: ContainerCreating Ready: False Restart Count: 0 Environment: <none> Mounts: /opt from nfs-vol (rw) /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-jg5t5 (ro) Conditions: Type Status Initialized True Ready False ContainersReady False PodScheduled True Volumes: nfs-vol: Type: PersistentVolumeClaim (a reference to a PersistentVolumeClaim in the same namespace) ClaimName: pvc-one ReadOnly: false kube-api-access-jg5t5: Type: Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources) TokenExpirationSeconds: 3607 ConfigMapName: kube-root-ca.crt ConfigMapOptional: <nil> DownwardAPI: true QoS Class: BestEffort Node-Selectors: <none> Tolerations: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Normal Scheduled 16m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/nginx-nfs-5f58fd64fd-qsqs8 to k8s-worker Warning FailedMount 3m4s (x3 over 9m54s) kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[nfs-vol], unattached volumes=[kube-api-access-jg5t5 nfs-vol]: timed out waiting for the condition Warning FailedMount 47s (x4 over 14m) kubelet Unable to attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[nfs-vol], unattached volumes=[nfs-vol kube-api-access-jg5t5]: timed out waiting for the condition Warning FailedMount 10s (x16 over 16m) kubelet MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "pvvol-1" : mount failed: exit status 32 Mounting command: mount Mounting arguments: -t nfs k8scp:/opt/sfw /var/lib/kubelet/pods/c79023bd-4e26-4ffd-b065-a198c8c03303/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/pvvol-1 Output: mount: /var/lib/kubelet/pods/c79023bd-4e26-4ffd-b065-a198c8c03303/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/pvvol-1: bad option; for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might need a /sbin/mount.<type> helper program.
Googling the error message suggested failure to install nfs-common, but it was installed on the cp node. While preparing this post I realized the pod is running on the worker node which didn't have it.
Running sudo apt -y install nfs-common
there and then recreating the pod resolved the problem.
I see I missed that 8.2 step 5 should've been run on the worker node, so my mistake.
Comments
-
Thanks for this hint!
0 -
Hi, I did the whole thing, including the "nfs-common" and I am not making any progress. I am not sure if someone has faced the same problem.
0 -
Hi @lzambra,
Please provide the sequence of commands you executed on each node, part of the nfs installation, and their corresponding outputs.
Regards,
-Chris0 -
ok, info to someone that might face the same issue:
On previous lab, you need to use the namespace "small", if you try to create the new pvc, this is going to use "pvc-one" as name, and you will have two under the same name. I just removed the pvc-one that belongs to small and recreate the pvc without namespace, also, I noticed that didn't work. But the issue here was that PersistentVolume was not created. So, I create the PersistentVolume (PVol.yaml) and after the "pvc.yaml" worked!
0 -
Hi, I also encountered this error with pod failing to mount nfs volume. However in my case specific error was "Output: mount.nfs: Failed to resolve server cp: Name or service not known"
I did not have "cp" defined in /etc/hosts on nodes, just "k8scp" as stated in labs. There are many issues on net where pod can't resolve nfs server hostname even if dns is working fine and the solution was to use IP address of the "cp" node in the PVol.yaml instead of hostname:
server:1.2.3.4
1 -
Hi,
I have followed these steps and yet I encounter this issue in lab 9.3 (previously 8.3):kubectl describe pod
Name: sakshi-nginx-nfs-68686f6d59-tljf7 Namespace: default Priority: 0 Service Account: default Node: sakshi-k8s-worker-node/134.221.126.56 Start Time: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:11:12 +0000 Labels: pod-template-hash=68686f6d59 run=nginx Annotations: <none> Status: Pending IP: IPs: <none> Controlled By: ReplicaSet/sakshi-nginx-nfs-68686f6d59 Containers: nginx: Container ID: Image: nginx Image ID: Port: 80/TCP Host Port: 0/TCP State: Waiting Reason: ContainerCreating Ready: False Restart Count: 0 Environment: <none> Mounts: /opt from nfs-vol (rw) /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount from kube-api-access-mqqj7 (ro) Conditions: Type Status Initialized True Ready False ContainersReady False PodScheduled True Volumes: nfs-vol: Type: PersistentVolumeClaim (a reference to a PersistentVolumeClaim in the same namespace) ClaimName: pvc-one ReadOnly: false kube-api-access-mqqj7: Type: Projected (a volume that contains injected data from multiple sources) TokenExpirationSeconds: 3607 ConfigMapName: kube-root-ca.crt ConfigMapOptional: <nil> DownwardAPI: true QoS Class: BestEffort Node-Selectors: <none> Tolerations: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s node.kubernetes.io/unreachable:NoExecute op=Exists for 300s Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Normal Scheduled 10m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/sakshi-nginx-nfs-68686f6d59-tljf7 to sakshi-k8s-worker-node Warning FailedMount 97s (x4 over 7m57s) kubelet MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "pvvol-1" : mount failed: exit status 32 Mounting command: mount Mounting arguments: -t nfs sakshi-k8s-cp-node:/opt/sfw /var/lib/kubelet/pods/a15e58a8-2031-4658-9a31-133257090160/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/pvvol-1 Output: mount.nfs: Connection timed out
This is how my PVol.yaml looks like:
apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata: name: pvvol-1 spec: capacity: storage: 1Gi accessModes: - ReadWriteMany persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain nfs: path: /opt/sfw server: sakshi-k8s-cp-node #<-- Edit to match cp node readOnly: false
Can anyone suggest a solution or someone else faced something similar?
0 -
Hi @sakshi1120,
Typically completing steps 1 through 4 of lab exercise 9.2 (Creating a Persistent NFS Volume) on the control plane node, followed by step 5 of lab exercise 9.2 on the worker node are sufficient to initiate the NFS server on the control plane node and the NFS client on the worker node respectively. Ensure that the steps work with the
k8scp
alias as presented, and/or with the control plane node hostname.However, there may be network settings at play to impact the desired operations and eventually outcomes in the subsequent lab exercise 9.3. In this particular scenario, can the worker node resolve the control plane node hostname? If in doubt, you can add the control plane node hostname alongside the
k8scp
recommended alias to the/etc/hosts
file of the worker node. The updated entry should look like thiscp-private-IP k8scp cp-node-hostname
(where you substitute cp-private-IP with the private IP of your control plane node, and cp-node-hostname with the hostname of your control plane node).Try to aim for consistency; if the
k8scp
alias works in lab exercise 9.2 (step 5), then use the samek8scp
alias in the PV definition manifest in step 6 of lab exercise 9.2, otherwise, attempt the same with the control plane node hostname instead. I would recommend using the hostname approach because the solution remains operational even in chapter 16 when thek8scp
alias will be assigned to another server.Regards,
-Chris0 -
Thanks Chris! This worked! I used control plane hostname in the PV definition manifest which the worker node couldn't resolve. Using the k8scp alias solved it.
0 -
Thank you very much.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 167 LFX Mentorship
- 167 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 802 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 358 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 149 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 82 DevOps Engineer IT Professional Program
- 127 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 112 Express Training Courses
- 112 Express Courses - Discussion Forum
- 6.3K Training Courses
- 24 LFC110 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 17 LFC131 Class Forum
- 42 LFD102 Class Forum
- 198 LFD103 Class Forum
- 19 LFD110 Class Forum
- 40 LFD121 Class Forum
- 15 LFD133 Class Forum
- 7 LFD134 Class Forum
- 17 LFD137 Class Forum
- 63 LFD201 Class Forum
- 3 LFD210 Class Forum
- 2 LFD210-CN Class Forum
- 2 LFD213 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 128 LFD232 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 1 LFD233 Class Forum
- 2 LFD237 Class Forum
- 23 LFD254 Class Forum
- 649 LFD259 Class Forum
- 109 LFD272 Class Forum
- 3 LFD272-JP クラス フォーラム
- 12 LFD273 Class Forum
- 161 LFS101 Class Forum
- 1 LFS111 Class Forum
- 1 LFS112 Class Forum
- 3 LFS116 Class Forum
- 1 LFS118 Class Forum
- LFS120 Class Forum
- 1 LFS142 Class Forum
- 2 LFS144 Class Forum
- 3 LFS145 Class Forum
- 1 LFS146 Class Forum
- 2 LFS148 Class Forum
- 2 LFS151 Class Forum
- 1 LFS157 Class Forum
- 1 LFS158 Class Forum
- 10 LFS162 Class Forum
- 2 LFS166 Class Forum
- 1 LFS167 Class Forum
- 1 LFS170 Class Forum
- 1 LFS171 Class Forum
- 1 LFS178 Class Forum
- 3 LFS180 Class Forum
- 2 LFS182 Class Forum
- 1 LFS183 Class Forum
- 29 LFS200 Class Forum
- 736 LFS201 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 2 LFS201-JP クラス フォーラム
- 14 LFS203 Class Forum
- 135 LFS207 Class Forum
- 1 LFS207-DE-Klassenforum
- 1 LFS207-JP クラス フォーラム
- 301 LFS211 Class Forum
- 56 LFS216 Class Forum
- 48 LFS241 Class Forum
- 48 LFS242 Class Forum
- 37 LFS243 Class Forum
- 12 LFS244 Class Forum
- LFS245 Class Forum
- LFS246 Class Forum
- LFS248 Class Forum
- 43 LFS250 Class Forum
- 1 LFS250-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS251 Class Forum
- 141 LFS253 Class Forum
- LFS254 Class Forum
- LFS255 Class Forum
- 9 LFS256 Class Forum
- 1 LFS257 Class Forum
- 1.3K LFS258 Class Forum
- 9 LFS258-JP クラス フォーラム
- 111 LFS260 Class Forum
- 149 LFS261 Class Forum
- 41 LFS262 Class Forum
- 82 LFS263 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 15 LFS264 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 11 LFS266 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 20 LFS267 Class Forum
- 18 LFS268 Class Forum
- 29 LFS269 Class Forum
- 5 LFS270 Class Forum
- 199 LFS272 Class Forum
- 1 LFS272-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS147 Class Forum
- LFS274 Class Forum
- 3 LFS281 Class Forum
- LFW111 Class Forum
- 256 LFW211 Class Forum
- 182 LFW212 Class Forum
- 10 SKF100 Class Forum
- SKF200 Class Forum
- 1 SKF201 Class Forum
- 782 Hardware
- 198 Drivers
- 68 I/O Devices
- 37 Monitors
- 104 Multimedia
- 174 Networking
- 87 Printers & Scanners
- 83 Storage
- 743 Linux Distributions
- 80 Debian
- 66 Fedora
- 15 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 23 openSUSE
- 148 Red Hat Enterprise
- 31 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 348 Ubuntu
- 468 Linux System Administration
- 39 Cloud Computing
- 70 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 90 Linux Security
- 77 Network Management
- 101 System Management
- 46 Web Management
- 55 Mobile Computing
- 17 Android
- 28 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1K Getting Started with Linux
- 362 Off Topic
- 114 Introductions
- 169 Small Talk
- 22 Study Material
- 507 Programming and Development
- 304 Kernel Development
- 204 Software Development
- 1.1K Software
- 211 Applications
- 180 Command Line
- 3 Compiling/Installing
- 405 Games
- 317 Installation
- 59 All In Program
- 59 All In Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)