"podAntiAffinity Example" errata?

millermatt

"podAntiAffinity Example"
https://trainingportal.linuxfoundation.org/learn/course/kubernetes-fundamentals-lfs258/scheduling/scheduling?page=9

Should

In this case, the scheduler will prefer to avoid a node with a key set to security and value of S2.

instead say

In this case, the scheduler will prefer to avoid a node running a pod that has a key label of security and value of S2.

?

serewicz

Hello,

Yes, that would be a more accurate representation of pod anti-affinity. I'll work on improving the language.

Regards,

kelemensanyi

This misleading sentence is still there. Would be nice to correct it, as this causes confusion.

fazlur.khan

@kelemensanyi,

Thank you for highlighting it. This will be updated in the next update very soon.

regards,
Faz