18.7.b Checking and fixing Filesystems II
I was checking into following statement, which did not make sense and I was wondering if it was meant to be "sudo fsck /dev/sda10" i.e. without the "-t ext4".
If the filesystem is of a type understood by the operating system, you can almost always just do: $ sudo fsck -t ext4 /dev/sda10 and the system will figure out the type by examining the first few bytes on the partition.
So I checked man fsck and now even more confused. To double check I also checked the source code for fsck and confirmed it align to what is stated in man.
from man:
-t fslist Specifies the type(s) of filesystem to be checked. When the -A flag is specified, only filesystems that match fslist are checked. The fslist parameter is a comma-separated list of filesystems and options specifiers. All of the filesystems in this comma-separated list may be pre‐fixed by a negation operator 'no' or '!', which requests that only those filesystems not listed in fslist will be checked. If none of the filesystems in fslist is prefixed by a negation operator, then only those listed filesystems will be checked. < irrelevant parts snipped out> Normally, the filesystem type is deduced by searching for filesys in the /etc/fstab file and using the corresponding entry. If the type cannot be deduced, and there is only a single filesystem given as an argument to the -t option, fsck will use the specified filesystem type. If this type is not available, then the default filesystem type (currently ext2) is used.
From source code:
/* * Run the fsck program on a particular device * * If the type is specified using -t, and it isn't prefixed with "no" * (as in "noext2") and only one filesystem type is specified, then * use that type regardless of what is specified in /etc/fstab. * * If the type isn't specified by the user, then use either the type * specified in /etc/fstab, or DEFAULT_FSTYPE. */
From this it would seem fsck does not check the partition but use fstab, or "-t", or default to ext2.
Can anyone confirm this or point me in the direction where I can find documentation discussing the "examining the first few bytes on the partition."?
Then, the original question I thought I was going to find the answer for: Were the "-t ext4" a typo in slide as referenced above?
Comments
-
It is not an error. From the man page for fsck, it explains the "-t" option as:
-t fslist
Specifies the type(s) of filesystem to be checked. When the -A
flag is specified, only filesystems that match fslist are
checked. .....There is no typo. fsck certainly does not look at /etc/fstab (the filesystem can easily be unknown there). Normally I would never use the -t option except in an error problem. For example, you culd have a certain filesystem type understood by the system but have no fsck progam associated it, say you are missing fsck.btrfs.
0 -
Thank you for clarifying. Based on your feedback I experimented a bit and found that if one is working on the command line specifying -t option indeed more than redundant - because it check for itself anyway.
For example I deliberately created a FAT filesystem, made sure not to include it in the fstab and ran fschk with "-t ext2" on it. Without any complaints it simply ran the correct check (fsck.fat).
Running the relevant filesystem checker (fsck.ext2) directly do not give you this safeguard and will happily destroy the filesystem trying to fix it.
fstab I guess therefore is only relevant during boot checks?This is not well documented, I think, and I probably would have not known this if it did not come up in this course (+1 for the course )
Is this a matter of the documentation not being quite up to date or is there some other sense to those statements that confused me? I would have thought the fact it checked anyway could have been mentioned somewhere.
0 -
I don't believe any fsck will destroy something it does not recognize, it will just say the superblock is not there etc. No fsck program makes changes unless you run it in "force" mode without requesting permission.
/etc/fstab is consulted:
1) at boot to decide what should be mounted at system start
2) later if you do a command like mount -a, or umount -a , or to mount a filesystem that has noauto specified so the system does not fail when booting and cannot mount it0 -
The curious person I am I tried it. And it did destroy it.
Yes, it tried to do plenty of superblock fixes, had to stick my finger to the "y" key for a while giving those permissions. After this I tried to mount it was not possible.On fstab, which process check/use the field we learn about in Mounting Filesystems (18.13.b) "fsck pass number (or 0, meaning do not check state at boot.". I thought it was fsck itself.
0 -
To experiment a bit with this, I created 5 partitions, from scratch, with each a different FS type: ext2, ext3, vfat, btrfs and xfs.
Then I tried to check these withfsck /dev/vgtest/lv${FS}
and it detected the right FS type indeed. So the man page is probably outdated, as it tells about/etc/fstab
but not about guessing the type from the actual FS.
As @jengel said, it even ignores a wrong type entered in the command line with-t
, and use the right checker.Out of curiousity, I added a new volume, with no FS but random data instead. Then issued
fsck /dev/vgtest/lvrandom
. It didn't recognized the FS type, and tried the default one, e2fsck, as stated in the man page. Obviously it didn't find any superblock.So I would remove the
-t ext4
from the third command in this page of the course. It's disturbing as the sentence says that fsck is getting the right FS type itself, but we put a type in the command line anyway (even a wrong one).0 -
This was already fixed quite some time ago in the working copy for next release. I don't know when the discussion was but I remember it and it was already done
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 167 LFX Mentorship
- 219 LFX Mentorship: Linux Kernel
- 795 Linux Foundation IT Professional Programs
- 355 Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 179 Advanced Cloud Engineer IT Professional Program
- 82 DevOps Engineer IT Professional Program
- 127 Cloud Native Developer IT Professional Program
- 112 Express Training Courses
- 112 Express Courses - Discussion Forum
- 6.2K Training Courses
- 48 LFC110 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 17 LFC131 Class Forum
- 35 LFD102 Class Forum
- 227 LFD103 Class Forum
- 14 LFD110 Class Forum
- 39 LFD121 Class Forum
- 15 LFD133 Class Forum
- 7 LFD134 Class Forum
- 17 LFD137 Class Forum
- 63 LFD201 Class Forum
- 3 LFD210 Class Forum
- 5 LFD210-CN Class Forum
- 2 LFD213 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 128 LFD232 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 1 LFD233 Class Forum
- 2 LFD237 Class Forum
- 23 LFD254 Class Forum
- 697 LFD259 Class Forum
- 109 LFD272 Class Forum
- 3 LFD272-JP クラス フォーラム
- 10 LFD273 Class Forum
- 152 LFS101 Class Forum
- 1 LFS111 Class Forum
- 1 LFS112 Class Forum
- 1 LFS116 Class Forum
- 1 LFS118 Class Forum
- LFS120 Class Forum
- 7 LFS142 Class Forum
- 7 LFS144 Class Forum
- 3 LFS145 Class Forum
- 1 LFS146 Class Forum
- 3 LFS147 Class Forum
- 1 LFS148 Class Forum
- 15 LFS151 Class Forum
- 1 LFS157 Class Forum
- 33 LFS158 Class Forum
- 8 LFS162 Class Forum
- 1 LFS166 Class Forum
- 1 LFS167 Class Forum
- 3 LFS170 Class Forum
- 2 LFS171 Class Forum
- 1 LFS178 Class Forum
- 1 LFS180 Class Forum
- 1 LFS182 Class Forum
- 1 LFS183 Class Forum
- 29 LFS200 Class Forum
- 736 LFS201 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 2 LFS201-JP クラス フォーラム
- 14 LFS203 Class Forum
- 102 LFS207 Class Forum
- 1 LFS207-DE-Klassenforum
- 1 LFS207-JP クラス フォーラム
- 301 LFS211 Class Forum
- 55 LFS216 Class Forum
- 48 LFS241 Class Forum
- 42 LFS242 Class Forum
- 37 LFS243 Class Forum
- 15 LFS244 Class Forum
- LFS245 Class Forum
- LFS246 Class Forum
- 50 LFS250 Class Forum
- 1 LFS250-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS251 Class Forum
- 154 LFS253 Class Forum
- LFS254 Class Forum
- LFS255 Class Forum
- 5 LFS256 Class Forum
- 1 LFS257 Class Forum
- 1.3K LFS258 Class Forum
- 10 LFS258-JP クラス フォーラム
- 111 LFS260 Class Forum
- 159 LFS261 Class Forum
- 41 LFS262 Class Forum
- 82 LFS263 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 15 LFS264 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 11 LFS266 Class Forum - Discontinued
- 20 LFS267 Class Forum
- 24 LFS268 Class Forum
- 29 LFS269 Class Forum
- 1 LFS270 Class Forum
- 199 LFS272 Class Forum
- 1 LFS272-JP クラス フォーラム
- LFS274 Class Forum
- 3 LFS281 Class Forum
- 9 LFW111 Class Forum
- 260 LFW211 Class Forum
- 182 LFW212 Class Forum
- 13 SKF100 Class Forum
- 1 SKF200 Class Forum
- 1 SKF201 Class Forum
- 782 Hardware
- 198 Drivers
- 68 I/O Devices
- 37 Monitors
- 96 Multimedia
- 174 Networking
- 91 Printers & Scanners
- 83 Storage
- 743 Linux Distributions
- 80 Debian
- 67 Fedora
- 15 Linux Mint
- 13 Mageia
- 23 openSUSE
- 143 Red Hat Enterprise
- 31 Slackware
- 13 SUSE Enterprise
- 348 Ubuntu
- 461 Linux System Administration
- 39 Cloud Computing
- 70 Command Line/Scripting
- Github systems admin projects
- 90 Linux Security
- 77 Network Management
- 101 System Management
- 46 Web Management
- 64 Mobile Computing
- 17 Android
- 34 Development
- 1.2K New to Linux
- 1K Getting Started with Linux
- 371 Off Topic
- 114 Introductions
- 174 Small Talk
- 19 Study Material
- 507 Programming and Development
- 285 Kernel Development
- 204 Software Development
- 1.8K Software
- 211 Applications
- 180 Command Line
- 3 Compiling/Installing
- 405 Games
- 309 Installation
- 97 All In Program
- 97 All In Forum
Upcoming Training
-
August 20, 2018
Kubernetes Administration (LFS458)
-
August 20, 2018
Linux System Administration (LFS301)
-
August 27, 2018
Open Source Virtualization (LFS462)
-
August 27, 2018
Linux Kernel Debugging and Security (LFD440)