LAB 6.2 Differences between rpm and rpm_BACKUP folders

gijohnny

I've performed the final 3 steps in the lab but the results are the same - missing db files - is this an issue? I've bolded the 3 db files showing in my backup that do not appear in the new rpm directory.

[[email protected] lib]$ ls -l rpm rpm_BACKUP

rpm:

total 136172

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7208960 Oct 22 22:58 Basenames

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     16384 Oct 22 22:58 Conflictname

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2891776 Oct 22 22:58 Dirnames

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     32768 Oct 22 22:58 Group

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     24576 Oct 22 22:58 Installtid

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     81920 Oct 22 22:58 Name

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     36864 Oct 22 22:58 Obsoletename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 125632512 Oct 22 22:58 Packages

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2584576 Oct 22 22:58 Providename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    647168 Oct 22 22:58 Requirename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    159744 Oct 22 22:58 Sha1header

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     98304 Oct 22 22:58 Sigmd5

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     16384 Oct 22 22:58 Triggername

rpm_BACKUP:

total 206612

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   8888320 Oct 20 17:07 Basenames

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     16384 Oct 20 17:07 Conflictname

-rw-r--r--  1 root root    286720 Oct 22 22:55 __db.001

-rw-r--r--  1 root root     90112 Oct 22 22:55 __db.002

-rw-r--r--  1 root root   1318912 Oct 22 22:55 __db.003

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   3715072 Oct 20 17:07 Dirnames

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     40960 Oct 20 17:07 Group

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     40960 Oct 20 17:07 Installtid

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    102400 Oct 20 17:07 Name

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     45056 Oct 20 17:07 Obsoletename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193372160 Oct 20 17:07 Packages

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   2543616 Oct 20 17:07 Providename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    864256 Oct 20 17:07 Requirename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    241664 Oct 20 17:07 Sha1header

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    143360 Oct 20 17:07 Sigmd5

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     16384 Oct 20 17:07 Triggername

[[email protected] lib]$ rpm -qa | tee /tmp/rpm-qa.output

<output redacted>

[[email protected] lib]$ ls -l rpm rpm_BACKUP

rpm:

total 136172

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7208960 Oct 22 22:58 Basenames

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     16384 Oct 22 22:58 Conflictname

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2891776 Oct 22 22:58 Dirnames

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     32768 Oct 22 22:58 Group

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     24576 Oct 22 22:58 Installtid

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     81920 Oct 22 22:58 Name

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     36864 Oct 22 22:58 Obsoletename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 125632512 Oct 22 22:58 Packages

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2584576 Oct 22 22:58 Providename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    647168 Oct 22 22:58 Requirename

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    159744 Oct 22 22:58 Sha1header

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     98304 Oct 22 22:58 Sigmd5

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root     16384 Oct 22 22:58 Triggername

rpm_BACKUP:

total 206612

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   8888320 Oct 20 17:07 Basenames

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     16384 Oct 20 17:07 Conflictname

-rw-r--r--  1 root root    286720 Oct 22 22:55 __db.001

-rw-r--r--  1 root root     90112 Oct 22 22:55 __db.002

-rw-r--r--  1 root root   1318912 Oct 22 22:55 __db.003

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   3715072 Oct 20 17:07 Dirnames

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     40960 Oct 20 17:07 Group

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     40960 Oct 20 17:07 Installtid

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    102400 Oct 20 17:07 Name

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     45056 Oct 20 17:07 Obsoletename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193372160 Oct 20 17:07 Packages

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   2543616 Oct 20 17:07 Providename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    864256 Oct 20 17:07 Requirename

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    241664 Oct 20 17:07 Sha1header

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root    143360 Oct 20 17:07 Sigmd5

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root     16384 Oct 20 17:07 Triggername

 

 

coop

I don't believe there is any problem here.  It is generating new database; notice it is smaller as the backup one had files that showed updates.  It's like housecleaning.  I would just check something like rpm -qa doesn't fail since it reads entire data base.